Project / sample name
Sample AI-generated Chrome extension fit check. This is fake/internal/sample data only.
Initial evidence snapshot
- Public repository surface was visible enough for a routing decision.
- File organization suggested a complete browser extension shape.
- No CI, automated test run, or repeatable install proof was visible.
- A visible issue described an install failure on a common local environment.
- No pinned dependency or lock-file evidence was available in the sampled surface.
Route recommendation
Route to the AI Code Stability Probe. The visible shape is strong enough to review, but the highest-risk question is false closure: it looks complete before runtime and dependency evidence support that confidence.
Visible gap / seam
Installability and runtime readiness remain unproven from the approved evidence surface. The seam is between the repo's apparent completeness and the missing proof that a user can install, run, and rely on the extension in a current environment.
Next safe move
Continue with a bounded AI Code Stability Probe that checks runtime claims, dependency assumptions, and the highest-risk generated-code seams before production work begins.
Private fingerprint language
A real private ledger entry would keep a private fingerprint of the accepted fit-check response, scoped evidence surface, and delivery receipt so a later reviewed probe can compare against this exact baseline.
- Entry fingerprint
- sample-entry0-7c4a...19df
- Prior entry
- None - initial baseline