# Trial Findings Report - Memory Palace

Version: `trial_public_findings_report_v0_1`
Generated at: `2026-05-12T19:49:34.355159+00:00`

## Trust boundary

Controlled public example only. No private repository access, no code execution, no arbitrary repo generation, and no claim beyond the listed evidence.

## User / probe question

Is the public Memory Palace retrieval benchmark claim supported by committed evidence?

## Source analyzed

- Repo: `milla-jovovich/mempalace`
- Case: `mempalace_retrieval_claim_probe_v1`
- Artifact kind: `claim_evidence_probe`

## How This Report Works

FoldEngine frames the question, checks approved evidence, records a receipt boundary, and recommends one stabilizing next move.

## GitHub read-only probe

Evidence-backed claim: the public Memory Palace retrieval benchmark claim is aligned with committed evidence. Raw LongMemEval rows: 500. Raw LongMemEval Recall@5: 0.966. This is evidence-backed committed artifact alignment, not independent scientific proof.

## Evidence checked

- committed LongMemEval benchmark result artifact
- benchmark documentation
- retrieval implementation anchors

## Metrics / signals

- raw_longmemeval_rows: 500
- raw_longmemeval_recall_at_5: 0.966
- finding: evidence-backed claim

## Repo Readout / Claim/Evidence Readout

Claim/evidence readout for milla-jovovich/mempalace: Evidence-backed claim: the public Memory Palace retrieval benchmark claim is aligned with committed evidence. Raw LongMemEval rows: 500. Raw LongMemEval Recall@5: 0.966. This is evidence-backed committed artifact alignment, not independent scientific proof.

## Profile / structure section

Profile support is limited to claim/evidence artifacts in this public sample fixture; no full repository profile packet is attached.

## Hygiene or alignment signals

Claim alignment signal: committed evidence supports the named metric, while independent scientific validation remains out of scope.

## Repo Glossary

Not available in this public sample fixture.

## Continuity Drift Signals

Not available in this public sample fixture.

## Bounded Insights

- Primary insight: The claim can be treated as evidence-backed only at the committed-artifact level.
- Recommended next move: Tighten stronger rerank/perfect-score wording so it names exact artifact, split, and metric.

## Trial Stability Checklist

- Narrow task: pass
- Explicit envelope: pass
- Grounded insights only: pass

## Candidate Eggs / next moves

- Candidate next probe: claim wording precision: Tighten stronger rerank/perfect-score wording so it names exact artifact, split, and metric.

## What This Report Does NOT Do

- independent scientific validation
- independent benchmark rerun
- full code review
- security audit
- not a full code review
- not a security audit
- not scientific proof
- no private repo access
- no repo code execution
- not legal certification
- not permanent proof

## Delivery / retention receipt

- Intended vault: `FoldEngine Operations / 03_Client_Reports`
- Public sample publication is allowed only for public_sample artifacts.
- Private/client reports must be retained without public exposure.

---

## Legal Disclaimer

This report is provided for informational purposes only. It is not legal advice, a security audit, a penetration test, a production certification, or a guarantee of any kind. FoldEngine reports are bounded diagnostics based on visible public evidence at the time of the probe. They do not replace professional legal, security, or engineering review. Use of this report is subject to the FoldEngine Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

(c) 2026 FoldEngine. All rights reserved.